When SIMPLE Is No Longer Enough

SIMPLE Retirement PlanAs acronyms go, this one does a great job of saying it all. SIMPLE retirement plans, or “Savings Incentive Match Plans for Employees” are certainly a simple way to provide retirement benefits to employees. The advantages of a SIMPLE IRA include:

  • No annual administrative costs;
  • No annual governmental filings;
  • Standardized employer and employee documentation;
  • Free pass on all non-discrimination testing.

These simplifications, however, come at some cost. SIMPLE IRAs require mandatory employer contributions made on behalf of the employees.  Costs above and beyond the employer contribution amount include:

  • The restriction on contributing to another plan if a SIMPLE plan is maintained for the calendar year;
  • The missed opportunity to save more — SIMPLE IRAs allow a maximum salary deferral of $12,500 ($15,500 age 50 and above);
  • The missed opportunity for investment growth on fewer allowable contributions versus a 401(k) plan.

401(k) plans offer very similar design options to SIMPLE IRAs, yet they allow much greater dollar amounts to be deferred by employees and contributions made by employers. 401(k) plans also offer the potential for more disparity between the amounts provided to the owner(s) vs. the amounts provided to employees.

As companies grow and retirement looms closer for executives, upgrading the retirement plan from a SIMPLE IRA to a 401(k) could offer greater value and opportunity. Let’s look closer at the two retirement options.

SIMPLE IRA and 401(k) Limits and Requirements

SIMPLE IRA and 401(k) Limits and Requirements
Click chart to enlarge

SIMPLE IRA Scenario 1 – Matching Contributions

Let’s assume you’re a small closely held business-owner with earned income of $150,000 and an employee payroll of $210,000 spread among five employees. In exchange for the guarantee to provide a matching contribution to the employees (3% dollar-for-dollar match of the employees’ compensation) of $3,300, you’re able to contribute $17,000 for yourself.

SIMPLE IRA Scenario 1 - Matching Contributions
Click chart to enlarge

401(k) Scenario 1 – Safe Harbor Match

In comparison, under a 401(k) plan, assuming the same rate of contributions by the employees and using the most similar plan design, you’re able to contribute a greater amount ($24,500 rather than $17,000) for that same $3,300 contribution made for the employees.

401(k) Scenario 1 - Safe Harbor Match
Click chart to enlarge

401(k) Scenario 2 – Enhanced Optional Matching Contribution

Unlike a SIMPLE IRA, a 401(k) plan allows you to add additional employer contributions in any given year. For example, in a year in which your profits are higher and otherwise would lead to greater taxable income, the profits can be deposited to the 401(k) plan and the tax is deferred. Here, by giving the employees another $3,300, you’re able to put away another $6,000.

401(k) Scenario 2 - Enhanced Optional Matching Contribution
Click chart to enlarge

SIMPLE IRA Scenario 2 – Non-elective Contributions

As an alternative to the matching contribution, SIMPLE IRAs allow you to choose to provide a non-elective contribution equal to 2% of compensation. Such a contribution would be provided to all eligible employees, regardless of whether they contribute to the plan, or not. Based on the same set of facts, such a contribution would look as follows:

SIMPLE IRA Scenario 2 - Non-elective Contributions
Click chart to enlarge

401(k) Scenario 3 – Non-elective Contributions

The 401(k) plan’s comparable design requires that the non-elective contribution go from 2% of pay (like the SIMPLE) up to 3% of pay.  However, it also allows you to go far beyond that. Therefore, let’s introduce some additional non-elective contributions in a 401(k) plan.  The following illustration shows what’s possible:

401(k) Scenario 3 - Non-elective Contributions
Click chart to enlarge

The above scenario does require that some of the employees be younger than the business owner. In order to prove that the current year contributions are not discriminating in favor of the owner, they are converted into their equivalent benefit amounts at retirement age.  Younger employees have more time over which to accumulate (via compounding) earnings on their current year contributions. Therefore, while their current year contributions represent a smaller percentage of their current year pay than that of the business owner, their equivalent benefit amount at retirement will be much greater than the owner’s contribution at retirement.

Summary

While the options listed above outline the differences in the current year contributions, it is really important to note that larger contributions then have more earning power in terms of market appreciation over time. Letting just one year go by where contributions are limited may be costing you significant retirement plan earnings. Contact us to learn about the options available to you.


All illustrations use the 2018 COLA limits. Plan Designs are for illustration purposes only. Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.

Consultation Request

Contact us for a consultation about your retirement plan options.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Schedule a Call

Let's talk!

Close